RRI’s Forest Tenure data tracks forest area under four tenure categories based on the rightsholder and strength of their rights under national law, employing a bundle of rights approach that links RRI’s qualitative and quantitative data.
Forest Area Data
Evidence from 58 countries covering nearly 92 percent of the world’s forests shows communities’ legal rights to own and manage forests increased from 2002 to 2017, with most of these gains occurring within 33 low- and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Yet, significant challenges in implementation remain and communities continue to contest lands controlled by governments and other actors.
Gender Data
Deeper analysis of the legal frameworks regulating community-based forest tenure in 35 countries shows that despite laudable international progress concerning the articulation of Indigenous, Afro-descendant, and local community women’s tenure rights and widespread constitutional protections for women’s equal rights, states are still failing to meet their legal obligations to legislatively protect women’s community-based forest tenure rights.
Across 104 legal frameworks analyzed from 35 countries that together cover about 80 percent of forests in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, specific recognition of women’s community-based forest tenure rights only improved marginally from 2016 to 2024.
Read about the methodology for each dataset: Forest Area and Gender.
New data for Depth of Rights is coming in 2025.
Read through RRI’s full methodologies for Forest Area and the Depth of Rights.
Explore country-level data on the distribution of Forest Tenure over time. Click on the country name to learn more about the legal frameworks recognizing community-based tenure, including the specific rights of Indigenous, Afro-descendant, and community women.
As of 2017, Indigenous Peoples and local communities are legally recognized as owning at least 447 million hectares (Mha), or 12.2 percent, of forestland within the 58 countries analyzed.
Country
Government Administered
2002 2017Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002 2017Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002 2017Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002 2017Highlighting in gray indicates Complete Case Countries.
Dashes (-) denote situations in which the tenure category in question is not legally possible under national law.
n.d. = No Data
Source: RRI. 2018. At a Crossroads: Trends in Recognition of Community-Based Forest Tenure from 2002-2017.
Read RRI’s Methodologies: Gender and Depth of Rights.
RRI’s Gender Database builds on the Bundle of Rights to assess the extent to which the same 35 countries’ legal frameworks recognize Indigenous, Afro-descendant, and local community women’s specific rights to community forests, and whether those states are meeting their obligations under national and international laws. These frameworks, called community-based tenure regimes (CBTRs), are defined as distinguishable sets of national, state-issued laws and regulations governing “all situations under which the right to own or manage terrestrial natural resources is held at the community level.”
Learn more about RRI’s Gender Methodology.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.
Source: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.