As seen on Outlook India

How The NDA Is Whittling Down Green Norms

  • Change in definition of no-go area in dense forest, leaving more area open for projects
  • Keeping powers with the Centre to even allow projects in ‘no-go areas’ of dense forests
  • Proposal to allow firms to take over afforestation, thus jeopardising the rights of tribals
  • Role of gram sabhas diluted or taken away under blanket consent for development
  • Automatic approval to highway and other defence projects near border areas
  • Moratorium lifted on new projects in several highly polluting industrial areas
  • National Green Tribunal role sought to be diluted by taking away the right to appeal to it

***

For years the proposal to develop a second airport for Bombay at Navi Mumbai had been awaiting environmental clearance. The issue had been the rivers and the mangroves near the selected site. With one stroke, all the concerns—including the stipulation to create a mangrove san­ctuary—have been brushed aside by the Narendra Modi government. Late last month, Union minister of environment and forests Prakash Javadekar gave the green signal to the project on the condition that the mangroves should be made unattractive for birds, given their potential threat to flying aircraft.

“In effect it would mean destroying the mangroves to stop birds from nesting there,” says Ulka Mahajan, an environment activist. “The intentions are very clear now; it is all only about corporates. The government is happy to wipe out nature.” The move will also destroy fish breeding in the shallow waters of the mangrove.  “It is ridiculous to say you can plant mangroves,” says Girish Raut, environmentalist and expert on mangroves. “It took hundreds and thousands of years for ecosystems to evolve and it takes one project to wipe it out.”

The Navi Mumbai airport project is just one of the many instances that highlight the BJP government’s cavalier attitude toward environment in its desire to speed up mandatory green clearan­ces for projects. Safe­guards for land, water bodies and environment are being carefully dil­u­ted. The policies of the government are steering us to a situation that poses a clear threat to India’s green spaces.

Closely linked to speedy environment clearances for infrastructure and other projects are forest clearances and the proposed land acquisition bill. While the former is being tweaked unmindful of the damage to green belts, the latter is yet another assault on the rights of farmers and tribals who will have little or no say in whosoever wants to acquire their land for setting up an enterprise or infrastructure project.

“The NDA has indicated support to AP govt for completion of Polavaram, though clearances are still not available.”M. Kodanda Ram, Political Activist

It reeks of a clear pattern. In an analysis of one year of Modi sarkar, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) director general Sunita Narain observed that incremental changes have been made to “ease the process” of project clearances. A major cause of concern, according to the think-tank, is the shift in responsibility of project clearances from the Centre to state agencies minus any capacity building or accountability. The states can now take their own decision on thermal power, irrigation, mining and other projects. Also, like many other development experts, the CSE has questioned the dilution of the public hearing process. Political activist M. Kodanda Ram points to the Polavaram dam project in Andhra Pradesh. Work started under UPA rule, despite violations galore—from not seeking public opinion, improper land acquisition to lack of statutory rehabilitation. In 2011, then environment minister Jairam Ramesh withdrew the environment clearance and stalled the project till the reorganisation of states.

“But now the NDA has given the state government indication of support for the completion of the project, though the clearances are still not available,” says Ram. “In this particular case, the damages to the forest and tribals who are going to be displaced is huge.” Both Orissa and Chhattisgarh have filed cases against the project in the Supreme Court.

A preliminary assessment by US-based Rights and Resources Group on the implementation of the Forest Rights Act has found a decided lack of effort to recognise the rights of forest-dwellers. Despite the law having granted traditional forest-dwellers community forest resource (CFR) rights, the study based on government data points out that so far “the total forest area over which CFR rights have been recognised is less than 5,00,000 hectares or barely 1.2 per cent of the CFR rights potential in the country”.

According to the Forest Survey of India, 1999, at least 40 mha of forest land, excluding around 8 mha of community forests in the northeastern states, are eligible for CFR rights recognition. “Evidence from different states clearly indicates the forest bureaucracy’s efforts to stall or subvert the CFR provisions of FRA,” says Kundan Kumar, the agency’s Asia director, highlighting experiences in AP, Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra.

“Mangroves will be destroyed to stop birds from nesting there. It is only about corporates, nature will be wiped out.”Ulka Mahajan, Environment Activist

Even as experts extol the political and economic benefits of granting FRA to both the state and forest-dwellers, the Modi sarkar seems more inclined to please corporates of all hues. What is more disturbing is that while India strives to assume a leadership role in global negotiations on combating climate change, it indulges in doublespeak that blames all voi­ces raised against government policies for stalling development.

In what is but a step up from the attacks during UPA rule, slowly but surely many of the civil society bodies known to work in the environment protection and forest rights space are getting edged out or sidelined. Javadekar assures this is not the case, the effort is to work with civil society bodies. “I want to foster all such pro­mising undertakings,” he says (see interview).

In the last 14 months, many among the projects cleared had been pending for some time and in some cases approved but not made known, according to official sources. In many cases, the clearances have happened only due to the amendments and dilution of many a rule that had been framed in the UPA regime to protect the rights of forest-dwellers or to safeguard the natural habitats of wild animals and protect dense forest covers.

Read the full article on Outlook India.